Interesting topic and something I’ve had to deal with as an employee and employer.
Employee - Not a massive fan, I really struggle to concentrate at home and with a young family there is always something to distract me. I also have a role that requires to be site based.
Employer - I support a team of engineers that need to be site based, though the wider business has a lot of WFH staff. It causes a lot of resentment within the team as they aren’t “allowed to stay at home”. I see it from both perspectives and all told, would rather encourage face to face discussion but appreciate it’s something that needs reviewed on a role by role basis. I do however think it’s the role that determines whether it’s WFH or not, rather than the person. I think that society is pushing towards WFH and 4 day weeks etc without considering some of the pros that site based work offer. I get a massive amount of value from ad hoc, spontaneous discussion that otherwise wouldn’t occur.
Finally, I’m 38 and 100% think that as I get older I’ll want to be at home more…..