toffee_pie

I don't know what happened I asked him sent me on the unit but I did not receive anything. Lexus being Lexus probably have tainted people's views on what they make and it's impossible that they have duff navigation units. I've been working on my Jaguar XKRS and like the Subaru I've had the battery off multiple times, nothing wrong and I can confirm that the Jaguar is quite complex with several different bus technologies going on and around 6 or more module controlling the navigation system itself As I said more than once this Navigation system on the Lexus has a design fault, but what would I know I just made a switching supply for my company over the last year - in rush current looks to be killing logic ICs due to lack of filtering and protection

No you don't - you need a claim against Lexus

Looks like an XJ V12 maybe... they dont make em like they used to eh

Some photos I have taken since January -- I spent around £800 getting all the chimney nuts pulled from all 4 wheels -- I think it was around that - it was part of the big service I done but it was around 2 days labour - Jag and AM use Chimney bolts to fasten the weel arch lining - they clearly wanted nobody to access beyond that area a decade later Replacing the 2 x air filters took me at least an entire weekend itself - the engine undertray and its 1,000 chimney nuts had to go - Subaru had 4 bolts, I think Its Jaguar -- what I can say as an Engineer is that is very evident many many Engineers were working on this - the variety of parts used is also an eye opener - Jaguar make some of the parts but most are third party The funny squiggles on the Air Intake pipes are not the result of someone who was on drugs at that time - they are used as dampers - to control the delivery of air into the SC chamber - if you replace the OE air filters with aftermarket ones you can trip the EML. The long term fuel trims on this 15 year old engine are around +/- 1% at idle, I am happy with that figure.

Apologies to the mods for derailing a Lexus forum on Jaguar - I have a good article here which explains everything. https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/xk-xkr-x150-33/xkr-75-magazine-article-110904/ Here is the XKR 75 - Early model 5.0 V8s have issues with timing chain tensioners - I never mentioned this but I specifically wanted a 4.2 V8 as its just more reliable, it has a correct dip stick also present and no tyre pressure monitoring or other stuff I do not want https://www.pistonheads.com/buy/listing/16729113 I put together an article on the XKR 75 last year for the Jaguar Enthusiast Club magazine. Since it's a UK-centric, members-only mag, someone asked if I could put the text up here once it was published. It's in the Feb '14 issue, so here's wot I rote: The XKR 75 Story The XKR 75 Goodwood Limited Edition was Jaguar’s 75th birthday present to itself and its customers – a ‘tougher’ version of the XKR with the emphasis on performance & handling. But what exactly is it, and how did it come about? Jaguar kindly arranged for me to speak to Dave Pook, one of the dynamics team that worked with Mike Cross, Chief Engineer, Vehicle Integrity at JLR, on the development. The genesis dates back to 2006, before the introduction of the 4.2 XKR. Mike, Dave and Matt O’Hara completed the XKR development, but still had the test vehicle; they decided it would be interesting to see how the car would be with a bit more driver-focussed development. Jaguar management told them they could carry on, but it would have to be in their own time – this flexibility to allow the use of company facilities to develop pet projects is something I’ve always admired in Jaguar. A lot of unpaid evening and weekend development work eventually led to the 2008 4.2 XKR-S, a 200-unit limited edition, with stiffened & lowered suspension, an aero bodykit, forged Vortex alloys and a top speed of 174 mph. But they didn’t stop there. While the development of the 5.0 XKR was underway, the same trio, along with Jon Croxford, Michelle O’Connor, Dave Moore and assistance from a few others, was working on a similar out-of-hours upgrade of the new car. With the new XKR’s more powerful engine and active differential, they were already a jump beyond the 4.2 package. Taking the same principles used on the 2008 car and starting with many of the same components (springs, dampers, forged wheels), they added revised steering, software tweaks and more power to the mix, with a new exhaust and a revised ECU map. The original incarnation appeared as the “Goodwood Special” in lurid lime green at the 2009 Festival of Speed. Come 2010, and it was Jaguar’s 75th anniversary. The Jag bosses, already impressed by the Goodwood Special, were persuaded to release a production version as a celebration model. Only 75 were made, sold in the UK, Germany, France, Italy, The Netherlands and Belgium – and only 20 of these were right-hand drive for the UK market. Unsurprisingly, they dropped the Kermit look, and all cars were kitted out in dark Stratus Grey with Charcoal leather and Piano Black veneer. Pale grey ‘mascara’ stripes over the wheel arches were, fortunately, an optional extra. A different 175-unit limited edition, the XKR 175, was released in the US & Canada, but this was basically a Speed Pack model without any further performance/handling modifications. The full “XKR 75 Goodwood LE” spec, and its relation to the later Dynamic Pack and XKR-S, is as follows: Power increased to 530PS (523bhp) from 510PS (503bhp) on the XKR, and torque increased to 655Nm (483ft-lb) from 625Nm (461ft-lb). This was achieved both through exhaust changes and recalibration of the engine ECU, the latter in partnership with the Rocket Sports Racing engineering team that worked with Jaguar on their 2010 motorsports programme. Off-the-record comments from Jaguar, mentioned in reviews published at the time, hint that the actual outputs are nearer 540bhp and 515ft-lb ‘Sports exhaust’ with improved performance and acoustics, removing the centre silencer boxes and replacing them with a crossover pipe, but retaining the rear box & outlets. A later refinement with larger outboard exhaust outlets became the Performance Active Exhaust, an XKR option and standard on the XKR-S. Upgraded torque converter to handle the increased torque (carried over to the R-S). Electronic speed limiter increased to 174 mph (280 km/h), and 0-60 time decreased to 4.4s, 0-100 to 8.9s. However, I’ve discovered that, on my car at least, the limiter seems to have been set at 186 mph (300 km/h), the same as the R-S. Re-tuned Adaptive Dynamics damper-control software, increased spring and damper rates (front springs 28% stiffer, rear springs 32%) and lower ride height (10mm). Active Dynamics was further tuned for the Dynamic Pack & R-S, but the springs and dampers are the same. New fully machined aluminium front and revised rear suspension uprights that increase camber stiffness by 30% – the former is unique to the 75, as the R-S and Dynamic Pack (being larger production runs) have a cast front upright with the same design. Speed Pack body kit with body-coloured finish: front splitter, side-sill extensions, rear diffuser and larger rear spoiler. This reduces lift by 25%. All of the exterior trim is also body-coloured or black. 20" Vortex forged lightweight alloy wheels, diamond-turned with dark grey finish, 9” front & 10.5” rear, with rear tyre width increased by 10mm to 295mm. The forged wheels reduce unspring weight by approx. 4.8kg. While the fronts are the same as the 2008 XKR-S, the rear wheels have a larger offset because the rear axle is different from the 4.2 XKR. Other goodies: XKR75 sill tread plate, active front lighting, DAB radio, red brake callipers, commemorative card signed by Mike Cross & Ian Callum, optional graphics pack. Although publicity at the time implied that there were revisions to the Electronic Active Differential software, the team ran out of time and budget and the standard XKR settings were used. That was rectified in the XKR-S, which received a custom version of the EAD and Dynamic Stability Control software. The success of the 75 showed that there was a market for a ‘harder’ XKR, and the team was given full company funding to develop the concept even further. The result was the XKR-S, with changes to the active diff., dynamic stability control and adaptive dynamics, as well as a revised body kit that reduced lift by 26% (1% more than the Speed Pack), a top-speed increase to 186 mph, and sports seats. Dave Pook has carried this work forward to the R-S GT, which he describes as “slightly bonkers”. In effect, therefore, the XKR 75 is what evolved into the Dynamic Pack (including the Speed Pack) and the Performance Active Exhaust, with the addition of engine power/torque enhancements and a stronger torque converter to handle those. It is a sort of halfway house between a fully performance-optioned XKR and the XKR-S. Buying Decisions So, how did I come to own an XKR 75? My policy is: buy a good-quality, low-mileage second-hand car every 10 years – I get to have a really nice toy, the quality means it lasts the distance, and over that period of ownership, it costs about the same as buying a ‘normal’ car every 3 years or so like my colleagues do. I bought my first Jag in 1989 – a black ’87 XJS V12. In 2000, I replaced it with an anthracite ’97 XK8 4.0. My XK8 was due for replacement three years ago, but the economic situation was taking lumps out of my savings and the car was running well, so I waited. I began to wonder: did I want to move on to the obvious replacement, a 5.0 XK or XKR, or should I consider something a little more exclusive like an Aston, or the true supercar performance of a Nissan GT-R? I realised I’d need to go for an older Aston to fit my £40k budget, and my servicing costs would increase. I test-drove several GT-Rs – the performance was phenomenal, but in normal city driving the ride was hard (even in ‘comfort’ mode). The cars had a clunky, mechanical feel compared to the XKRs I drove, and the run-flat tyres tramlined horribly. So, a great track car, but not so pleasant for normal driving. In the end, I came back to the XKR 5.0, and was looking for a Black Pack plus Speed Pack model when I stumbled upon an XKR 75. I liked the spec, I liked the look (they had removed the mascara stripes) and I liked the exclusivity. I contacted the dealer, and after a haggle on price, we had a deal. Driving Experience On the road, the 75 is noticeably firmer than a standard XKR, but it hasn’t lost the classic Jag compliance; it’s certainly much more comfortable than the Nissan GT-R. The suspension changes make the steering very direct – you point, it goes. It understeers on the limit, because it’s a heavy car, but you have to push it very hard to find that limit. The car feels very well planted, particularly in Dynamic mode, and the handling is sharper than a standard XKR (based on my limited experience of the later). The torque is massive, and it far exceeds the rear tyres’ ability to deliver it to the road. You have to learn to feed the power in off the line, or the DSC traction control steps in and you proceed in a series of surges as DSC cuts in & out. Of course, you can switch to Trac DSC or even turn DSC off, but then you’ll leave long black lines and may still not accelerate any quicker, or you’ll experience some very tail-happy moments. The exhaust sound is glorious. When idling, it sounds like a dragon gargling; if you give the throttle a good shove in neutral, there’s a wicked crackle on the overrun; when you give it the beans while moving, there’s a mighty roar. This car can be loud. Around town, on dual carriageways or motorway, there’s really not a lot of advantage over the standard XKR. It’s different on an autobahn, where the much higher speed cap does allow you to just blast past slower traffic when a gap opens up. No-one passed me on my non-restricted autobahn travels; a 911 Carrera 4S (not the latest, probably a 997) came out to play, but couldn’t keep up. However, it’s on two-lane A- & B-roads with twists, turns and short straights that it really comes into its own. In Sport mode, the throttle response is immediate and massive – you find yourself past the two cars in front before you’ve even thought about it, and you suddenly realise that the other two further ahead are still within safe reach. And, of course, it’s playing our favourite V8 tune as it goes… On the track, the car achieved a 8:01 Nürburgring Nordschleife lap time in the hands of Dirk Schoysman, a flying Dutchman whose company provides a lot of Jaguar’s ‘Ring test pilots. That was a full lap, not the usual touristenfahrten “bridge to gantry” lap that is 1.5km shorter, and it was achieved despite light traffic. That’s 25s quicker than the best XKR time I can find; the best XKR-S time is 10s quicker again. My own Nordschleife experience was not in the same bracket, but I found the handling very predictable, and the huge torque was a real boon in the uphill sections and short straights. The tyres and brakes worked really well; I only triggered ABS once despite some heavy braking, and there was no fade at all. In fact, the car seemed to simply shrug off the experience without any drama. I haven’t driven an XKR-S, but I’m sure the experience would be very similar. However, the R-S remains out of my price bracket, and I don’t like the front-end treatment. The 75 is a bit more subtle (if a big black monster can be subtle), and I really prefer its look, though I appreciate the practical reasons for the R-S body changes. There are some curious omissions – there’s no air-quality sensor in the climate control, and they didn’t put the adaptive cruise or tyre-pressure monitoring options in, which I feel is a little odd in what was a top-of-the-line exclusive model. Dave Pook thinks some of this may be related to cooling; certainly, adaptive cruise isn’t an option on the R-S. I’ve had to have a couple of minor issues addressed under warranty, and (like many XKs, it seems) the information & entertainment module is occasionally temperamental. But overall, I’m extremely happy with the car; it’s quick but is happy to just rumble along, has sharp handling but isn’t harsh around town, loud when appropriate but not wearing on long trips – and something special, since there are only 20 just like it. Thanks, Mike, Dave P, Matt, Jon, Michelle and Dave M; those evenings and weekends resulted in a real classic.

Just stop..!

That would be it yes 😁 Unfortunately it has 9 owners I think that was used for photo shoots or editors or something as it's a strange thing to have so many owners. It's a cracking vehicle, the driving dynamics are what makes it special, I needed a special vehicle to replace the Subaru and this is the result of a few years of research, you don't need to feel bad about not understanding what it was, from what I see on the various Jaguar groups in Facebook about 90 percent of Jag people don't know what it is either.

Yes that sounds about right, the rear RS badge can be retrofitted, the speedometer can't, the sills and seats have branding too - there's clues but you need to know what to look for

The last time I checked there was ONE real XKRS on auto trader, a 4.2 version. In Scotland You need to remember here we are talking volumes sold of these cars of basically nothing, the fact that the DVLA says it's a XKR is telling they couldn't be bothered with paperwork for a few extra cars. The engine is the same but the ECU is mapped differently I believe, transmission changes most likely are different, suspension is different the interior is all black and there's a carbon fibre aero kit fitted, Alcon brakes have 6 pots in the front (400mm disc) and 4 pots in the rear. No spare wheel because they couldn't get a wheel to cover the rear wheels back then so they included repair gunk XKR-S branded mats are included and XKR-S branded seats too, my car mats are in the loft as you won't ever see them again and I think they would cost several hundred pounds itself if you were to find a set Driving mine each day knocks any future value off it I would think but that's my own problem.

I've not given them a second though, I've certainly more to worry about driving this than manky struts! Keeping on top of service is crucial, I had two oil changes when I had received the car because I didn't know or trust what was used in the initial service so had it replaced by correct oil and filter soon after, transmission fluid and brake fluid and everything else with a fluid was done, coolant was ok mind. Transmission service around £400. Front Brakes were refurbished a few years ago at a circa £2000 bill but I had the calipers inspected I wouldn't really worry about the struts too much what's more annoying is that cover in the boot with them useless clips, I've given up trying to replace them and using the car without the cover now as per photo

It was 200 units, 150 were allocated to Europe LHD, and 50 were allocated to the UK. I already explained AT - They include XKRs as a R-S - and the V5C refers to them as a XKR also. There is no XKR-S for £12K and not 15 on the list, you still seem confused on what I actually have. It sometimes feels everything I say is lost. More of these were sold in Europe and they are not cheap https://www.autoscout24.com/offers/jaguar-xkr-xkr-s-4-2-s-c-coupe-gasoline-black-0a3f621f-2a2f-4121-aafa-2d48393d9343?sort=standard&desc=0&lastSeenGuidPresent=true&cldtidx=5&position=5&search_id=1hfe3yfb42v&source_otp=t10&ap_tier=t10&source=listpage_search-results&order_bucket=2 https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-reviews/jaguar/jaguar-xkr-s-2008-review/ https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-spottedykywt/one-of-50-jaguar-xkr-s-for-sale/45323

The SC - you dont have any so I would gather your engine runs cooler - If I went for a 1 hour drive and back home and check the engine 4 hours later it will still be hot, 2 hours later it will be scalding hot. Thats why there are vents in the bonnet.!

Nothing to feel bad about, I was around 2 years looking into the various XKs about - I knew nothing about a XKR-S either, so when one appears for sale there was only ever one outcome. You can compare the Jag to the LC500 here - not much in it...keeping in mind the Jag is 15 years old but its had magic worked on its suspension by the aforementioned trio - I actually think the figures quoted are generous because if you stamp the accelelerator all hell breaks loose in D mode let alone S https://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_cmp2.php#gsc.tab=0 Here is the boot struts, a bit manky but they are doing what they should do - 48k miles on this when I got it, 1 owner - no rattles bangs knocks, still smells of leather inside.! I have aluminium on the dash because I wont be using it for a few days and it takes a minute to fit as opposed to getting a damaged dashboard and what that will involve

I removed all the plastic covers on the engine, it gets ridiculous hot..I don't need to make it worse. I have a F9 obd reader to monitor the coolant and oil levels, it's the most important piece of kit ever. I was under a ramp while it was getting wheel alignment in May and under the engine was like a sauna, unbelievable.

Here is the exhaust note of mine - this is at around 3k rpm as I had to consider the neighbours... https://youtube.com/shorts/FYrZgE8pr78?feature=shared

And I am weary of parking it, I got another email at work to shift Car reg xxxxxx and park in a normal spot, I parked at the entrance up on grass wasn't doing anything to anyone. It's a tight fit in normal parking bays and people nowadays just don't care do they

Well TBF I said quite a lot in my original post, the worst thing you can do is blert on about stuff without being a subject matter expert of sorts.. I've made the same mistake many a time.! They only sold 50 of these in the UK, there's no hope 15 are for sale on AT 15 years later. It's a really special thing indeed, I do plan to get this up on YouTube as many have been asking about it The 'regular' XKR is fantastic too, astonishingly fast.

The V5C has XKR on my logbook too, even the DVLA can't differentiate the models, probably good for insurance!

Exactly, my mind was like you only live once and will be dead far longer than you are alive so live for the moment

It's not a RS, there's one listed I believe which is actually a RS. AT includes regular XKRs as a RS. I know of someone who got a 'RS' last year from a dealer near me in Glastonbury - I already spotted it. The chap who did buy it realised after it wasn't actually a real one and returned it, I knew from the photos it wasn't a genuine one. The Speedo is the big giveaway as it's got a 180mph limit and RS branding - it can't be retrofitted. Alcon brakes and the large wing can be fitted depends if the buyer at the time had got lucky and Jaguar had fitted them or maybe they were upgrades. They really are quite a different beast over a XKR, check out the CAR review in 2008 it has a good driving experience summary

12K, I don't think you know what a XKR-S is, no disrespect but I was a few years researching the various Jag XKs, won't get for £17k either, check how much they cost in mainland Europe.

I have looked into LC500 actually but it's too heavy and the Jaguar is far more of a driver's vehicle, reference to the CAR review - it was a bit long ago but still relevant. The chassis of the XKR-S is different than a regular XKR, I was worried initially it would be boaty on B road's but it's actually very well planted indeed obviously not as sharp on corners over a hot hatch but it would be sharper than a LC500.

Mine is 'only' a 4.2 but as per the performance figures its far from slow - the performance on the 1/4 mile is around 200ms within a 5.0 SC or something like that - the ECU had been meddled with this and they may have done something else also as the value of this was £80K in 2008 which was a serious wedge. The aero kit is all carbonfibre and there are aero deflectors on the underside also - handling is firm but very planted and I dirve on B roads. My struts look ok, I can take some photos - the window trim I would take to a specialist who does this sorta work - its easy enough to remove these i think - I dont think polishing will work

Interesting to see a XK on here, I was nattering on about replacing my Subaru a few years ago on here and some chap mentiond several vehicles that were 'doable' and falling into line with what I was looking for - a few of the cars were a Porsche Panemara and a Jaguar XK - now I quickly - ish ruled out the former as it was just a bit too gangly, boaty and a bit much but the Jaguar XK, well now we are talking. I spent considrable time researching these and somehow ended up getting a XKR-S in January, a 4.2 XKR-S - these are so rare even bods on FB groups thought I put stickers and body kits on it - it was a skunk works project by the three lads working for Jaguar back in the day who wanted the 4.2 XK to go out with a final flourish so they came up with this and Jaguar made the 200 units, 50 were sold in England but my guess is less than 15 are actually around Spotted this in December 2023 and could not stop looking at it and drove over in January a 8 hour round trip to take this home otherwise I would never forgive myself, I still had a Subaru which eventually sold in May. I am using mine as a daily, servicing on these is absolutely crucial so the person here who has a XK should have replaced all the fluids as a matter of priority, plus the tranmission fluid and a new fuel filter. Mine gets around 18mpg on my crappy commute to work, if you reset the counter and wing it up to Scotland you would get around 30mpg. These engines are good for stellar mileage once looked after, Electrical gremlins need to be treated with caution there is a whole list of DTCs that are actually nonsense - there is a list if you google it. Its quite low down and it might be my age but you let out a grunt getting out of this thing, not Lamborghini Huracan grunt but getting to that stage - interior finishing is sublime, for a vehicle 15 years old. Driving this home I was thinking to myself how can I describe this and my words were a guided missile with a free armchair attached - the mad thing is I have not shifted this into S yet and I have it over 8 months. Quoted performance is 0-60 in 4.4s and 174mph but with the limiter removed its good for 180mph+ CAR did a review of this in 2008 - they done a 1:1 with a Maserari Granturismo S - the reviewer said not only was the Jag better than the Maser, it was better than an Aston Martin Vantage and a Bentley Continental too and you would need a Ferrari 599 to trump it, Not sure what Mike Cross, Dave Pook and Matt O'Hara done to the 4.2 lump but they done a heck of a job Cheers to the chap who mentioned Jag...! I think I will be back to Lexus but not just yet ...Now that S mode is like what Father Dougal was feeling like on the airplane

I don't really care much about fixing or not - just seeing if I can find out what's happening with the unit and if some light can be shed. I have no idea when I get a chance to look at this but send it anyway.