Do Not Sell My Personal Information Jump to content


Goggy

Established Member
  • Posts

    342
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Tutorials

Lexus Owners Club

Gold Membership Discounts

Lexus Owners Club Video

News & Articles

Posts posted by Goggy

  1. Yesterday I did a 77 mile trip on ECO mode, then on the return journey I was in NORMAL mode. The journey was 75% motorway, the rest being mostly 'A' roads mainly with a speed limit of 70, but some at 50. It was light rain both journeys. Outward journey I kept at 70 all the time using cruise control, coming back I was late for a meeting so drove a bit faster, 75+. 

    Outward journey 37.8, back was 37.5.

    So hardly any difference and with the faster journey coming back I expected to be 35-36, but it was only a very small amount less. 

    It's probably fair to say a mainly motorway journey is not the best option to use a ECO v NORMAL comparison check, but I still expected a bigger difference. I don't think I did anything else to affect the result, and the conditions were identical. 

    I will do another some time, but maybe I will  try none motorway. 

    Odd result that.

  2. I found in ECO mode it made a very small difference to MPG, but for me the car was less responsive, so I have not used it much at all, I just leave the car in NORMAL mode. I will try it out again on a longer journey to see if there is any significant difference. I find the MPG is much reduced at 80mph instead of 70. When the motorway to my daughters was all 50mph due to roadworks I found the car managed about 5mpg more. 

  3. It sounds like the sort of journey that will suit a hybrid well. The poorest MPG is on very short trips or motorways, but on that distance and on 'A' and 'B' roads, up and down hills you should get a reasonable MPG. Obviously going up hills you will use more petrol, but coming down you will find it will much less, staying in EV mode longer. If your speed is also 30-50 mph I would not be surprised if you do 40-45 mpg. Let us know. 

  4. 10 hours ago, Sybaris said:

    OK not many 200T F Sports in this thread.  So for anyone wondering, I am getting up to 23 mpg mainly driving local town centres and suburban roads on short journeys.  I feel this is on par with a lot of 2.0 petrol engines.

    Yes, from what I have seen that is about right. Longer journeys giving 27+?

  5. Only issue I had with my CT was the ride was a bit firm for me. I must point out I have a medical issue that makes the ride important to me, as well as a poor balance, so I needed something easier to get in and out of. Other than that it was a dream to own. I now have a NX as the ride is smoother and being higher up it's easier for me to get in and out. I tried lots of other SUV's but I stuck with Lexus as the CT was the best car I have ever owned. 

    • Like 1
  6. Good review that. :yes:

    It's interesting how he is very impressed regarding MPG. I have noticed that from various USA reviewers. I think it is the fact that the USA claimed MPG is always more accurate in the USA, rather than our UK hyped industry con trick, which disappoints most buyers as some believe they will get what is advertised. Whilst in the US, the opposite happens when they find they get even more than the published figures. It's about time it is sorted out. 

     

    Sorry, went a bit off topic there. :wacko:

  7. Another good photo Andy. It makes me want buy myself a better camera rather than just use my Iphone 5S which is just too convenient, although I have to say you get quite good results, much better than I expected. I still have a little Canon Powershot camera, which is very good but I rarely use it these days other than on holiday. I used to have a SLR, but it became faulty and the size puts me off. Maybe a Bridge Camera is the answer. Or this:

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

    http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_TZ70_ZS50/

    A mate of mine, who knows a lot about photography and cameras, says it's the best small camera right now, bar none. 

    • Like 1
  8. Taken from another forum.

    1. AWD models do get the adjustable damping (stiffer in Sport S+ mode).
    2. Sport S mode makes the throttle more sensitive, and changes the way the transmission shifts (shift a bit quicker and at a higher RPM).
    3. Sport S+ mode stiffens the suspension as well as the steering feel. On RWD models I believe this is the mode that the steering ratio quickens but I'm not sure as i have the AWD IS350F.
    4. Eco mode tones everything down for the sake of fuel economy. The throttle is much less sensitive (all the power is there but you have to move the throttle a lot more to get to it). The transmission also shift sooner in each gear to keep the engine revs low.

    Does that help?

×
×
  • Create New...