In this time of declining standards, the wish to park "properly" is a good thing and a matter of pride. The problem is
whether it is possible to reconcile this attitude with the need to protect yourself from the increasing number of fellow
drivers who do not share it. Certainly, parking at an angle is a viable protective stratagem when spaces are unmarked
since any new neighbour will almost certainly duplicate your angle and keep an acceptable distance. To hog more
room than you are entitled to when parking in marked spaces, perhaps straddling two of them, might, apart from
other considerations, not discourage prospectively unwelcome neighbours but have the effect of inviting them to
teach you a lesson by getting stupidly close to your outer extremities thus forcing you to wriggle around when you
come to drive off. Or such has been my own experience on some of the few occasions when I have been tempted
to occupy more space than I should. All in all, I believe vertical parking to be generally a bit safer than parking
parallel to the kerb. In this latter case, apart from needing to watch out for the kerb itself, you have no control
whatsoever over who or what you may find behind and/or in front of you or how close they were to your gleaming
paintwork when they arrived.
Nobody said anything about straddling lines?
I did, having noticed that a lot of people do, and, to my shame, have occasionally done myself.
Im just saying - what is the need for parking perfectly straight in a parking space?
The main point about parking straight is that it reflects a desire for tidiness and orderliness that I personally consider
praiseworthy, not least because fewer and fewer people appear to share it. Also, car-parks and parking areas have
parallel lines painted on the ground not only so that you should stay within them but also so they can help you to
position the car straight.
But does it really matter if you park straight or not as long as you're in the lines?