Leaderboard

Except it costs another £2k. I've driven the cayenne too. It's too stiff and looks so bad I'd rather have a Nissan Qashqai. And I'm not a fan of how you have to spec the car up with absolutely everything. You barely get anything as standard. Alex Wurz has given his views on the IS300H and RCF. Both have been consistent with what I found when I drove them. Cayenne VS RX is almost like M4 VS RCF, both are quite different in how they get from A to B with RCF being superior on the road IMO because of the smoothness, drivability and balance between comfort and stiffness as well as styling. Id expect the RX vs Cayenne to be similiar to that comparison. Lexus have shown what they can do with the IS and GS in terms of dynamics. Those are dynamic leaders in pretty much every country apart from this one. Im sure Lexus won't have bodged their bread and butter vehicle up like they did with the NX Besides, Cayenne is VAG. Id rather not, had enough experience with VAG to decide it's not for me.

Apparently Colgates only provides protection for 24 hours and should be applied with a brush,spat out but don't rinse :)

It's all of them. If you click on the check coverage icon, the right one on your screenshot, and then a country it will list which one of the 4 discs it is on. People on ebay are just purchasing the full pack from Lexus and selling the individual discs. It's cheaper to purchase from them if you just want one disc, for example the West one for the UK, but two or more and you should just purchase from Lexus.

Not forgetting of course the lack of an EGR system gives me another BHP over the LS400 :)

To be on the safe side input you current disc number into the Lexus maps update website and see what the latest version is and how much it cost and take it from there,as you run the risk of getting the wrong one off the bay,hopefully you will then have an idea of the exact ones you need.

It's Fixed I pick it up tommorow CJ Sent from my iPhone using Lexus OC

The best way to buy a car is to take the deposit contribution for finance and then pay the lot off after 14 days. That way you get the contribution (although its still best to read the small print) and only have to pay a small proportion of interest. The interest isn't exactly low rate. Even if you pay 3% on a £53k GS450h, it'd cost you an extra £1.5k a year or thereabouts as you pay it off. Eventually it works out £5-7k dearer. If you change your car on a regular basis, the 40% you talk about is depreciation, thats it. You dont own the car. Its worth noting that every stonechip, every wheel scuff and every scratch is taken into account...... at DOUBLE the price it should cost to fix when you hand the car back. Therefore, you end up actually putting about 60% in for 3 years or so. You talk about putting 100% in. Thats not entirely true. You put 100% in when buying the car, when you sell it you get 50-60% back after 3 years so it costs 40-50% instead of 60%. When you take the £54k into account the 10-20% difference is huge!

They have been shamed into lowering diesel prices by the media, as wholesale market prices for diesel have been lower than petrol for some time now, and as usual, they haven't been passing it on to us. I thought an inquiry into fuel prices was conducted a while back, and it concluded that the big corporations were being fair in passing on lower costs to motorists. No doubt like all government or independent inquiries, backhanders were rife, and those on the committee probably had vested interests in the companies they were investigating.

Short and sweet review! Id disagree with the diesel comments - Ive just been driving my father in law's BMW 520d while he's on holiday - told me to give it a good drive. Its a 2 year old car with 15k on the clock so id assume he drives 7.5k miles a year. Well, I decided to give it a good drive after 2 months sitting in the driveway and the DPF need cleaning on the Idrive. Took it out for a 40 min drive up and down the motorway and it was still on! Not exactly refined - clatters too much IMO and runs out of puff over 3k rpm so sucks the joy out of driving on B roads. I prefer a good petrol engine which likes to rev high

Hi CJ, I contacted the ebay guys breaking up the RX400h and they have the inverter and have quoted £400 for it, well worth a look ;o) Cheers, Col.

I agree that the LS is so quite, it is only road noise at 60mph you hear, and that UK roads are so naff the harsh surface creates too much noise. I will say that went out in a Golf Blue Motion the other day (one of my sales teams car), and the road noise was almost as good as the LS (but then it has narrower tyres) One thing to remember is that the LS was designed before the advent of computer technology used extensively in car design, so I suspect newer Lexus cars will have the upper hand in better acoustic isolation, and there would be 60 computers working on the problem, not 60 engineers.

Thanks Colin, I think a lot of people dont realise how close the specs are on the 400h models & like you say there have really only ever been minor changes.... (I mainly attribute this to car dealers applying the term "Top of the range" to anything that has a wooden gear knob ... lol}

Hi all, Just to say that I think I solved the issue, managed to buy a 2007 350 SE which original purchaser upgraded to inlude sel level spec without air suspension so a great result, only 55k miles too.

Most Lexus owners will agree that their cars have seldom been favoured by European reviewers in borderline comparisons with German ones. And yet we have still chosen to drive a Lexus, in most cases with few or no regrets, and this implies that while we may find specialist reviews interesting or enjoyable to read, we have ultimately ignored the opinions offered. As for myself, the 300h I am currently driving my fifth Lexus and still fail to understand why reviewers tend to emphasise negatives even when their overall impressions may be broadly favourable, though I have noticed that the opinion gap has narrowed with recent models. Mostly, comparative reviews are informative enough as regards quantitative data whereas final verdicts and how they are arrived at and presented are to a large extent subjective and therefore prone to bias. Since it is common knowledge that magazines and other media are largely financed by advertising income and that some advertisers are more important than others, it follows that any reliance we place on the good faith of reviewers, assuming we care, depends on how cynical or mistrustful we personally are. And even when the magazines do not carry advertising and trade on a reputation for fairness, the thought must still occur that journalists, editors and publishers can be influenced by other means and that vested interests are not always easy to identify. In short, it is a fact that car reviewers rarely find it in their interest to favour David over Goliath. In this connection it would be interesting to know if the ability of the big Japanese car manufacturers, with the Toyota Corporation at the helm, to influence media coverage and opinion in Asia and Australasia might not equal that of the Germans in Europe and with comparable results. European imports in the luxury sedan segment in these areas appear to sell largely on the basis of exclusivity (and maybe a bit of snobbery) in much the same way as low numbers on the road are an attractive selling point to many Lexus customers in Europe (myself included), the technical excellence of the brands concerned being universally acknowledged irrespective of their origin.