Your chance to tell Starmer what we think of his government!

[Brian R]

Not sure that it will get us anywhere, but it can't help to let Starmer know what we think of his "government".

Sign here

[Mossypossy]

Surely what YOU think. WE is assuming too much.

[Malc1]

I have happily signed 👍

It seems an Official Petition now at a million plus signatures 

Malc 

[Pauly C]

I have to be extremely careful here...I'm in the CS...I will say no more😉😆

[Boomer54]

20 minutes ago, Malc1 said:

I have happily signed 👍

It seems an Official Petition now at a million plus signatures 

Malc 

Does this mean we are cancelling our Coup D'etat ?

[KentColin]

I really hope it's possible to be a Lexus owner and  not a Daily Mail reader

[Malc1]

46 minutes ago, Boomer54 said:

Does this mean we are cancelling our Coup D'etat ?

Nope. You’re the Big Boss …… Boss 

Malc 

[Kevin Williams]

[Boomer54]

2 hours ago, Malc1 said:

Nope. You’re the Big Boss …… Boss 

Malc 

Good stuff, stick to the plan. I do the frontal assault with psychobabble whilst you sneak in behind with your trustee walking stick.

D day reinvented as G(eriatic) day.

[rich1068]

17 hours ago, KentColin said:

I really hope it's possible to be a Lexus owner and  not a Daily Mail reader

So do I. Had enough of that on the Merc forum.

[Boomer54]

At the greatest risk of showing my naivety what is "a Daily Mail reader"? Honest question, I have no idea.

[Mossypossy]

Probably someone who has no sense of irony.

[Malc1]

1 hour ago, Boomer54 said:

At the greatest risk of showing my naivety what is "a Daily Mail reader"? Honest question, I have no idea.

When you open the post popped thru your letterbox by our illustrious postman/woman or whatever 🤔

[Boomer54]

1 hour ago, Mossypossy said:

Probably someone who has no sense of irony.

I see, so akin to "make America great, vote Trump".

[Mossypossy]

Easy to bash any ruling party. Trouble is nobody can point to a year when all can agree it actually was great, nor who our last super government was.

[Boomer54]

21 minutes ago, Mossypossy said:

Easy to bash any ruling party. Trouble is nobody can point to a year when all can agree it actually was great, nor who our last super government was.

Interesting, but I wouldn't necessarily agree.

[Mossypossy]

My point exactly.

[Malc1]

we could vote for next Guy Fawkes night effigys of  ........  Starmer with no karma  and Rachel Reeves the Queen of Thieves of course 

Malc

[Boomer54]

1 hour ago, Mossypossy said:

My point exactly.

"Point to a year" Starting there . 1954."All" in this case would be my entire fan club. I know ,because I just asked her and she nodded (in her sleep).

On a more serious note. "Easy", strictly speaking the easiest thing to do is inarguably simply nothing. Say nothing ,take no action. Even taking the time and energy to talk ,or complain ,etc requires more effort. Moving on, whilst "great" is a word thrown around, I think most people wanting change are more likely to be aspiring to something that was simply better that they feel they have lost. Sticking with the latter "all" people in the loosest sense might be able to find a year they preferred to the one they are in and even if that was not the same year for everybody they might still be in agreement they were better years than the current one.

If you were alluding to the idea that complaining is often easier than solving when it comes to managing and resolving issues then in that I would agree. Hence, my use of the word "necessarily" just in case that is what you really meant.